Hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) with co-occurring autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD)
- 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, King Abdullah Medical City, Mecca, Mecca region, Saudi Arabia
- 2 Department of Internal Medicine, King Abdullah Medical City, Mecca, Mecca region, Saudi Arabia
- Correspondence to Dr Randah Dahlan; randahdahlan@gmail.com
Abstract
Hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) are two distinct genetic diseases that may affect the kidneys through different mechanisms. ADPKD is a common genetic disorder that leads to exponential formation and growth of cysts replacing all segments of nephrons. Hereditary TTP is a rare autosomal recessive disorder that leads to the disseminated formation of arteriolar platelet-rich thrombi, which produce manifestations of various organs dysfunction. We present a case of a pregnant female with hereditary TTP co-occurring with ADPKD. To our knowledge, this is the first case in the literature describing the co-occurrence of ADPKD and hereditary TTP. We aim to describe the clinical course including the renal and the pregnancy outcomes, describe the consanguinity and family history, and try to explain the potential effect of one disease on the clinical course of the other.
Background
Genetic disorders involving the kidneys and leading to renal failure are either chromosomal, monogenic or polygenic.1 Monogenic disorders are caused by a mutation of one gene, and they are inherited as either autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive or X-linked. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most prevalent hereditary kidney disease, and it is the most common hereditary cause of end-stage renal disease in the adult population.1 It is caused by a monogenic mutation of either the PKD1 or the PKD2 gene, which encodes the polycystin-1 and polycystin-2 proteins, respectively.1 The PKD1 gene is located on chromosome 16p13.3, while the PKD2 gene is located on chromosome 4q21. When women with ADPKD get pregnant, the overall risk of fetal complications is similar to those without ADPKD while the risk of maternal complications such as the development of new onset hypertension, worsening or pre-existing hypertension, oedema and pre-eclampsia is increased.2
Hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is another monogenic disorder, which may also affect the kidneys leading to renal failure. It is, however, inherited as autosomal recessive and caused by a mutation in the gene encoding for von Willebrand factor (vWf)-cleaving protease enzyme called ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13).3 Pregnancy in women with hereditary TTP may be the first presentation of the disease, and is usually associated with severe complications.3 Maternal complications may include hypertension, severe pre-eclampsia, neurological manifestations such as transient ischaemic attack and acute kidney injury.4 5 Fetal complications may include premature birth, intrauterine fetal death and stillbirth.4
Knowing the underlying genetic disorder, the pattern of inheritance and the clinical course is crucial to the management of all affected patients. This is especially relevant when counselling patients about the risk of passing on the disease to offspring and pregnancy outcomes, and the screening and counselling of other family members.
Case presentation
A woman in her late 20s, G1P0 at 16 weeks gestation, presented with a history of fatigue and spontaneous bluish discolouration over her arms and legs. This patient had no history of trauma or bleeding, fever, chills or headache. Her systemic review was unremarkable. She was using no medications apart from antenatal vitamins. All couples in the family are distant cousins and descend from the same tribe. Her paternal family history is unremarkable; however, her maternal family history reveals that her mother has chronic kidney disease secondary to ADPKD and started haemodialysis in her 70s. The patient’s eldest sister has one son, she had an ultrasound for her kidneys and it was unremarkable. Another sister had hereditary TTP diagnosed during the neonatal period and died in her 20s. The third sister also died in her 20s during her first pregnancy when she was presented with bleeding (died before testing was performed). The fourth sister is in her 20s, has never been pregnant and was diagnosed with hereditary TTP as an adolescent. The youngest sister is in her 20s with no previous pregnancies. She has no symptoms, and her kidney ultrasound tested negative for polycystic kidneys. The index patient’s family history is summarised in figure 1.
Pedigree of the patient’s family. Squares represent males and circles represent females. Solid blue squares indicate affected males with the disease mentioned inside the square, Solid pink circles indicate affected females with the disease mentioned inside the circle. The arrow indicates the patient described in this report, diagonal line indicates deceased relative. Red lines between couples indicate that they are from the same tribe (distant cousins). ADPKD, Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, hTTP, hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, NT, not tested.
On clinical examination, she was conscious, alert and oriented. Her blood pressure was 164/83 mm Hg, pulse 85 beats/minute, respiratory rate 18 /minute and oxygen saturation 98% on room air. She was afebrile. Respiratory, cardiovascular and neurological examination was unremarkable. She had bilateral pitting lower limb oedema. She also had multiple ecchymotic patches over her arms, legs and thighs. Abdominal examination revealed a gravida uterus with a fundal height corresponding to 16 weeks of gestation. Urine examination showed no casts, white blood cells of 18–20, red blood cells of 20–25, blood as+2 and protein as+3.
Investigations
Initial and subsequent relevant laboratory investigations during the hospital course are summarised in (table 1). After admission, an ultrasound of her kidneys was performed, which showed bilateral cortical rounded echoic structures with posterior enhancement, representing a simple renal cyst (figure 2).
The patient’s initial and subsequent relevant laboratory investigations
Investigation | Result | ||
On presentation | Peak after admission | On discharge | |
Haemoglobin (g/L) | 103.0 | 102.0 | 90 |
Platelet ×109 /L | 35 | 83 | 316 |
White blood cells ×109 /L | 20.2 | 7.3 | 10.6 |
Reticulocyte count (%) | 6.71 | 8.2 | 6.6 |
Sodium (mmol/L) | 140 | 140 | 144 |
Potassium (mmol/L) | 3.8 | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) | 28 | 34.8 | 31 |
Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.87 | 1.49 | 0.8 |
Lactate dehydrogenase U/L | 1222 | 707 | 290 |
International normalised ratio | 1.05 | 1.01 | 0.89 |
Prothrombin time (s) | 26 | 32 | 29 |
D-dimer (ug/mL) | 2.6 | 3.5 | N/A |
Fibrinogen (g/L) | 2.2 | 2.6 | 3.3 |
Albumin (g/dL) (3.4–5.0) | 2.9 | 1.96 | 3.1 |
Bilirubin total (mg/dL) (reference: 0.0–1.0) | 1.9 | 0.83 | 0.4 |
Bilirubin direct (mg/dL) (reference: 0.0–0.5) | 0.34 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) (46.0–116.0) | 59 | 39 | 84 |
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L) (15.0–37.0) | 49 | 26 | 19.5 |
Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) (14.0–78.0) | 29 | 6 | 26 |
24 hours urine protein mg/24 hours | 2489 | 11 411.8 | 5944 |
Peripheral blood film | Leukocytosis, normochromic normocytic anaemia, anisocytosis and thrombocytopenia. | ||
Direct antiglobulin test | Negative | ||
Blood cultures (aerobic and anaerobic) | No growth | ||
Antinuclear antibodies (immunofluorescence) | Negative | ||
Anti-dsDNA (immunofluorescence) | Negative | ||
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (c and p) | Negative | ||
AntigGlomerular basement membrane | Negative | ||
C3 (reference range: 0.9–1.8) | 0.7 g/L | ||
C4 (reference range: 0.1–0.4) | 0.09 g/L | ||
Anticardiolipin antibodies | Negative | ||
Hepatitis B surface antigen | Negative | ||
Antihepatitis C virus | Negative | ||
HIV screening (antigen-antibody combination test) | Negative | ||
ADAMTS13 Activity and inhibitor profile | Activity assay<5%, no inhibitors | ||
Genetic test (ADAMTS13 gene sequencing) | Homozygous mutation (NM_139025.4; c.3070T>G) |
-
ADAMTS13, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13; Anti-dsDNA, anti-double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid; C3, complement 3; C4, complement 4.
Ultrasound of kidneys. The top images show bilateral simple cysts seen at the time of initial presentation. The bottom images show multiple cysts of different sizes affecting both kidneys consistent with polycystic kidney disease, seen on subsequent admission 4 years later.
Treatment
She was admitted as a case of pre-eclampsia with the suspicion of TTP for further workup. Autoimmune tests, ADAMTS13 activity and inhibitors profile, genetic testing for ADAMTS13 were sent. Initial fetal ultrasound showed a single viable intrauterine pregnancy with an estimated gestational age of 16 weeks and 6 days. After admission, she received methyldopa and labetalol for blood pressure control, as well as pulse steroids and plasma exchange through a central line. Her clinical and laboratory parameters did not improve. Ten days after admission, she developed shortness of breath, haemoptysis, severe hypertension and hypoxaemia. Her chest X-ray revealed diffuse bilateral extensive infiltrates. She was transferred to the intensive care unit where she was intubated, mechanically ventilated and started on broad-spectrum antibiotics, intravenous diuretics and an intravenous nitroglycerin infusion for volume overload.
Transthoracic echocardiogram showed reduced a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40%–45%. Bronchoscopy revealed old clots in the trachea and left main bronchus but there was no acute bleeding. She also developed acute kidney injury with a peak creatinine of 1.49 from an initial level of 0.8 mg/dL. This was managed conservatively. An ultrasound scan of the kidney showed two bilateral simple cortical cysts. In addition, she had therapeutic thoracentesis for right pleural effusion. Despite continuing on high-volume plasma exchange and steroids, her clinical and laboratory parameters did not improve. Repeat fetal ultrasound showed oligohydramnios and a non-viable pregnancy. She underwent surgical termination of pregnancy after conducting a multidisciplinary meeting between all involved teams and the family. She continued to receive plasma exchange and steroids, and rituximab was added after the operation. A kidney biopsy was performed and showed changes suggestive of acute and chronic thrombotic microangiopathy. She improved dramatically over the next few days and was successfully extubated. Her laboratory investigation results including creatinine, platelets and haemoglobin, improved. After discharge, the results of ADAMTS13 activity profile and genetic testing were available and are shown in table 1. She was switched to a plasma infusion every 3 weeks, and steroids were tapered off.
Outcome and follow-up
Four years later, she was admitted with nausea, vomiting and epigastric pain. During the admission, an ultrasound scan of the abdomen was performed which revealed multiple cysts of different sizes affecting both kidneys consistent with polycystic kidney disease (figure 2). This was redemonstrated on a CT scan of the abdomen which was done to rule out pancreatitis. She likely had viral gastritis, which improved with conservative management. Her creatinine at that time was normal, and she had no proteinuria. She was informed that she has ADPKD based on her radiological findings and family history. She remains under outpatient follow-up and is asymptomatic. From the TTP point of view, she is in complete remission and has not required plasma infusion in the last 2 years (with a platelet count between 250 and 330 × 109 /L, and a haemoglobin level between 105.0 and 118.0 g/L). In terms of ADPKD, her last creatinine is 0.9 mg/dL, and her urine protein to creatinine ratio (PCR) is 0.05 mg/mg on perindopril (peak urine PCR was 1.13 mg/mg). We informed the patient of the previously mentioned maternal and fetal complications, which may occur in pregnant patients with hereditary TTP or ADPKD. She was strongly advised against any unplanned pregnancy. However, she was informed that even planned pregnancy with close monitoring and prophylactic plasma infusion may not prevent the occurrence of some complications such as pre-eclampsia.5 This may be especially true in her case because she has two genetic conditions that may predispose to severe pre-eclampsia, given that the pregnancy outcomes of similar patients are unknown. She has discussed the pregnancy plan with her spouse and some of her family members, and has opted to avoid pregnancy. However, when she was referred to the gynaecology team for counselling about contraceptive methods, she refused tubal ligation. She and her spouse decided to pursue reversible male contraceptive methods.
We advised her that all her siblings need to be screened with measurements of ADAMTS13 activity. This is particularly important for her two sisters who are not known to have hereditary TTP and have never been pregnant before. All living sisters have had an ultrasound scan of the kidneys (found to be normal). We have advised that other adult siblings will also need to have an ultrasound of their kidneys, and we have strongly recommended that other family members see their family physicians for screening and counselling including premarital counselling.
Discussion
Consanguinity refers to a kinship of two individuals sharing a common ancestor. The rate of consanguineous marriage varies between countries but is higher in the Middle East, and parts of Asia and Africa.6 For example, the overall rate of consanguinity in Saudi Arabia was found to be around 57.7%, with first cousin marriages being the most frequent, followed by distant relative marriages and second cousin marriages.6 Consanguineous marriage is associated with an increased rate of rare autosomal recessive disorders in the offspring of the mating couples. Although consanguineous marriage between those who are not second cousins or closer might be less significant, this may not be the case in situations of complex consanguinity caused by cousin marriages in successive generations.7 Furthermore, the probability of co-occurrence of two independent rare genetic diseases in a single individual has been studied using whole-exome sequencing, and it showed that the risk of potential co-occurrence is underestimated in consanguineous families.8 9
Understanding the impact of this co-occurrence on the clinical course and the outcome of both diseases or the features of the dominating disease is important for the management of patients and prognosis.
For example, ADPKD has been reported to co-occur with tuberous sclerosis (TSC), which is another autosomal dominant genetic disorder that affects multiple organs including the kidneys.10 Affected patients may develop renal angiomyolipomas and renal cysts. The co-occurrence of ADPKD and TSC may be explained by the fact that TSC genes (TSC2) and ADPKD genes (PKD1) lie immediately adjacent to each other on chromosome 16 p. Although this co-occurrence is rare, affected patients develop a severe form of ADPKD and reach end-stage renal disease in childhood or early adulthood.10 Another reported genetic co-occurrence in ADPKD is the rare coinheritance of PKD1 and PKD2 gene mutations in the same patient.11 While the occurrence of either of these mutations is enough to lead to ADPKD, co-inheritance is associated with more severe and rapidly progressive disease.11
In the above-described case, the co-occurrence of ADPKD and hereditary TTP cannot be explained by contiguous deletions since the ADAMTS13 gene maps to chromosome 9. However, the patient and her sisters are products of a complex consanguineous marriage in which the parents and both grandparents are from the same tribe. This may explain the occurrence of a rare autosomal recessive disorder like hereditary TTP and the co-occurrence of two independent genetic diseases. When she was first presented, the focus was on her acute and critical condition with a picture of severe TTP, so the family history of ADPKD and the simple renal cysts discovered on her ultrasound were overlooked. However, the diagnosis of ADPKD was then established based on her strong maternal family history and classical findings seen in the new radiological imaging.
There is a possibility that the patient’s acute presentation of hereditary TTP may have accelerated the process of cysts formation and growth. This is because, in ADPKD patients, it is believed that ‘a third hit’ is required for the initiation or acceleration of cyst formation.12 To understand this, we need to know the mechanism of cyst growth in ADPKD. Polycystins and cilia in renal tubular epithelia seem to be responsible for inhibiting or regulating excessive proliferation of tubular epithelial cells that occur in response to renal injury. It has been hypothesised that polycystin 1 and cilia may not have a major function in healthy adult kidneys, but their main function starts when kidney injury takes place.12 For patients with ADPKD, the presence of the germline gene defect is considered the ‘first hit’, but this is usually not enough for cyst formation. A somatic mutation affecting the normal haplotype may occur at any time during adulthood and acts as a ‘second hit’. Additional factors such as ischaemic or toxic renal injury, causing initiation or acceleration of cyst growth, may act as a ‘third hit’.12 In hereditary TTP, certain conditions (eg, infection, inflammation, pregnancy), cause endothelial cells to secrete the ultralarge vWf multimers into the circulation, and in the absence of ADAMTS 13, it will then bind to platelets resulting in aggregation, microthrombosis and organ ischaemia.3 We hypothesise that the renal injury caused by the acute presentation of hereditary TTP may have acted as the third hit in the above-described patient causing acceleration of the growth of cysts and initiation of new cyst formation, seen on renal imaging 4 years later. In addition, during pregnancy, there is a physiological increase in renal vascular and interstitial volume with a subsequent increase in kidney volume.13 Therefore, we believe that renal hypertrophy with the other pregnancy-associated renal haemodynamic changes could also have acted as a ‘third hit’ causing acceleration of cyst formation and growth.
Counselling patients with hereditary diseases is a crucial part of their management. Counselling must include discussion of disease course and prognosis, and premarital and preconception counselling must include antenatal screening and discussion of the risk of transmitting the disease to offspring. Counselling patients’ family members is also essential. It is believed that when it comes to patients with hereditary kidney diseases, all family members are affected.14 This is because even those without the disease are also involved as caregivers, kidney donors or both.14 This is especially true in diseases with 100% penetrance as in ADPKD. This means that all individuals who inherit PKD1 or PKD2 mutations will eventually develop kidney cysts. However, the onset of clinical manifestations is variable. Patients with PKD1 usually have more and larger cysts, and they present with symptoms at a younger age, with an average age of onset of end-stage renal disease of 54 years compared with 74 years in patients with PKD2 mutations.1 Family members of patients with ADPKD who are younger than 18 years of age are usually not screened, while older members (males and females) need to be counselled on whether to be screened or not and to understand the benefits as well as the adverse consequences of screening.15 The benefits may include reassurance of unaffected members, early detection and treatment of complications associated with ADPKD for those who are discovered to be affected (eg, screening for intracranial aneurysm in selected patients and pregnancy-related risks in females). In addition, screening will allow for appropriate family planning especially that affected individuals have a 50% risk of passing the condition on to offspring, and will also allow for having a family plan for kidney donation—especially when a large number of family members are affected.14 Adverse consequences of screening may include the psychological impact on members with positive screening test, and the potential impact on employment and insurability. Screening is usually done by performing an ultrasound of kidneys, which is widely available and inexpensive. Genetic testing for ADPKD is an expensive method and not routinely used for screening, but it could be considered when a definite diagnosis is required (eg, prior to kidney donation) in relatives with negative or uncertain imaging results, or when it is required for reproductive counselling. For hereditary TTP, all siblings of affected patients need to have their ADAMTS13 activity measured as soon as the index case is identified. If ADAMTS13 activity is severely deficient, then genetic testing is done to confirm the diagnosis of hereditary TTP.16 Although hereditary TTP usually presents during neonatal period or during pregnancy, the expression of the disease and its clinical presentation may vary. Therefore, an asymptomatic sibling with severely reduced ADAMTS13 activity of either gender and at any age may experience an episode when exposed to a stimulus, such as infection. Affected individuals with hereditary TTP need to know that their offspring have a 25% chance of being affected, a 50% chance of being carriers and a 25% of not being affected. In families where consanguineous marriage is common, multiple meetings may be required with as many members of the family as possible with a focus on the impact of consanguineous marriage of the next generations.
In summary, we describe the first case of ADPKD co-occurring with hereditary TTP; describe the consanguinity, family history and the possible impact of one disease on the other. This case rereinforces the fact that the risk of coinheriting two genetic diseases in consanguineous families is increased. Counselling patients and their family members about this increased risk is paramount.
Patient’s perspective
-
I am also married to a distant relative, and although I always wanted to have children, I don’t want to pass any of my diseases to them.
-
I have texted everyone in the family to tell them to go and get an ultrasound of their kidneys, and that we will likely pass on the disease to the next generations if we continue to marry from the same tribe.
Learning points
-
Hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) may coexist, with the possibility that TTP may accelerate the course of ADPKD.
-
The patient’s parents are distant relatives, however, complex consanguinity caused by cousin marriages in successive generations in their family likely contributed to inheriting these two independent genetic diseases.
-
Counselling of patients with genetic disorders, as well as their family members, is a crucial part of their management. This is especially important when two genetic disorders coexist, and in families where consanguineous marriage is common.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
-
Contributors RD (corresponding author): was involved in the care of the patient, conceived the presented data, collected the data, drafted the manuscript, revised it and approved its final version. RD agrees to be accountable for the article and to ensure that all questions regarding the accuracy or integrity of the article are investigated and resolved. EB: involved in the care, helped with the literature review and with acquisition of the data, drafting the manuscript and approve its final version. EM also agrees to be accountable to the article.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer